Jun 12, 2026

Sagay: PDP Aspirants Face Uncertain Future After Supreme Court Verdict

By Afolabi Olaiya Idowu in politics

👁️ loading views...

Former Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Professor Itse Sagay (SAN), has expressed concerns that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) may face significant legal hurdles ahead of the 2027 general elections following recent court decisions on the party’s leadership crisis.

Speaking in a telephone interview, the senior advocate argued that the Supreme Court’s ruling on the PDP’s internal dispute has placed the party in a difficult position, raising questions about its ability to validly field candidates for future elections.

The controversy stems from a Supreme Court judgment delivered in April, which upheld the nullification of the PDP’s November 2025 national convention held in Ibadan, Oyo State.

The apex court also dismissed a cross-appeal filed by officials linked to one of the party’s rival factions.

The ruling was further reinforced by a subsequent Court of Appeal decision in Abuja, which reportedly held that any structure established from a convention already declared null and void lacks legal validity.

Reacting to the implications of the judgments, Sagay maintained that the failure to clearly recognise any of the competing factions within the PDP could create uncertainty over who has the authority to manage the party’s affairs and nominate candidates for elections.

According to him, the absence of a legally recognised leadership structure could expose any candidate presented by the party to future legal challenges, even if such candidates are allowed to participate in elections.

“If neither faction is recognised as legitimate, then the party faces a serious challenge in presenting candidates,” Sagay said, warning that rival contestants could later challenge the eligibility of PDP candidates in court.

The legal scholar further argued that the Supreme Court, as the nation’s highest judicial authority, should provide clarity in situations involving competing party factions to avoid prolonged disputes and uncertainty within the political system.

He noted that political parties require a clearly recognised leadership structure to function effectively, stressing that unresolved leadership battles could weaken internal administration and affect electoral preparations.

Sagay also expressed surprise that no faction had emerged with clear judicial recognition following the court rulings, insisting that the situation could generate confusion among party members, aspirants, and electoral stakeholders.

While acknowledging that further legal actions may still be pursued, he maintained that the PDP would need a definitive resolution of its leadership dispute before approaching future elections with certainty.

The PDP has yet to issue an official response to Sagay’s remarks, but the party’s leadership crisis continues to generate debate within political and legal circles as preparations gradually begin for the 2027 general elections.