Supreme Court Bans ‘Barrister’ Title in Official Correspondence
***
Abuja, Nigeria – July 31, 2026 — The Supreme Court of Nigeria has ordered legal practitioners, court registrars, and litigation staff to stop using the title “Barrister” as a prefix to their names in all official dealings with the apex court.
The directive, contained in an internal memorandum dated July 13, 2026, was issued by Chief Registrar Kabir E. Akanbi on the instructions of Chief Justice of Nigeria Kudirat Kekere-Ekun.
The circular is titled “Prohibition of the Use of the Title ‘Barrister’ as a Prefix to Names.”
What the Memo Says
The memorandum states that the practice is “inappropriate and inconsistent with the standards of professionalism expected within the Supreme Court of Nigeria.”
It directs all concerned officers to discontinue the use of “Barrister” before their names in official correspondence, records, documents, identity materials, and any other engagements with the court—with immediate effect. Department heads are expected to ensure full compliance.
Preferred Professional Style
Within the legal community, the preferred formats now being discussed include “M. A. Omopupa, Esq.” or “Mr. M. A. Omopupa.”
Many practitioners note that “Barrister” describes a professional qualification rather than a formal title or prefix suitable for official court documents.
The directive applies specifically to interactions with the Supreme Court and is part of ongoing efforts to maintain consistent standards of professionalism at the nation’s highest court.
Public and Professional Reactions
News of the circular spread quickly on Friday, generating mixed reactions online. Some lawyers and observers welcomed the move as a return to traditional professional etiquette.
Others questioned whether the focus on titles represented misplaced priorities amid broader challenges facing the justice system.
Regardless of the debate, the instruction from the Chief Justice is clear and binding for anyone engaging officially with the Supreme Court.
The development underscores the apex court’s continued attention to the form and substance of professional conduct within its walls.
Lawyers and court officials are now expected to adjust their letterheads, signatures, and identity materials accordingly.
How do you feel about this news?
Community Additions
Have a news tip, correction, or extra context about this story? Post it below instantly. All submissions appear live on this screen immediately.